Ratification of the Constitution
It was very difficult to ratify the Constitution for many reasons. This difficulty was mainly because nine states had to ratify the Constitution in order for it to be official and many were concerned about the possible new form of government. Those that opposed the Constitution were called antifederalists. Antifederalists believed that it was wrong to create the Constitution and argued that "the delagates in Philadelphia had exceeded their congressional authority by replacing the Articles of Confederation with an illegal new document" (The Ratification of the Constitution). These beliefs made ratification a somewhat problematic process. Some people believed that the Constitution was made to benefit only the well-off Philadelphians and that the Constitution "gave too much central power to the central government" (The Ratification of the Constitution). Most of these allegations were able to be countered by Federalists, who were in favor of the Constitution. The federalists claimed that "rejection of the constitution would result in anarchy and civil strife" (The ratification of the Constitution). One of the most significant of convictions was that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights but the federalists, such as James Madison verified that one would be made promptly after the ratification (The Ratification of the Constitution). Overall, the ratification process was strenuous for many reasons but the Constitution was eventually effectuated.
Works Cited: The Ratification of the Constitution (article from class)